Court Rejects Opinion Testimony Offered by Prof. Nash
Characterizing his expert report as "legal argument dressed as expert testimony", the U.S. Court of Federal Claims held that Prof. Ralph Nash of Georgetown University, a leading government contracts expert and prolific author, won't be permitted to testify as to his legal opinions in a patent infringement case. The opinion contains an excellent summary of the case law on when expert testimony crosses the line into forbidden legal conclusions.
Copy of decision also available here Download file
Post A Comment / Question