Late Notice Bars Coverage for Condo Defect Damages

Division 1 not only barred coverage due to late notice in this case -- a hard enough feat under Washington's relatively liberal test for deciding whether a failure to comply with an insurance policy's notice clause will forfeit the insured's rights -- but it did so on summary judgment.

So what was the prejudice to the carrier caused by the late notice?  It happened when the insured (without notice to the carrier) agreed to submit to arbitration of defect claims made by a homeowner's association.  This waiver of judicial remedies, the Court said, was "significant" enough to constitute prejudice as a matter of law.  Coverage denied.

Copy of decision also available here Download file

Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.