Posted on April 27, 2007 by John Parnass

Court Rejects Opinion Testimony Offered by Prof. Nash

  • Email This
  • Print
  • Comments
  • Share Link

Characterizing his expert report as "legal argument dressed as expert testimony", the U.S. Court of Federal Claims held that Prof. Ralph Nash of Georgetown University, a leading government contracts expert and prolific author, won't be permitted to testify as to his legal opinions in a patent infringement case.  The opinion contains an excellent summary of the case law on when expert testimony crosses the line into forbidden legal conclusions.

Copy of decision also available here Download file

Tags:
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.